coaching / client-case-studies · article
coaching/ · 5,972 w · 27 min · ✎ dialogue

Client Case Studies

A named, substantive reference to Jason's live and recent coaching engagements — the specific people, companies, situations, and outcomes that make up his active practice. This page is Jason's private wiki and uses full names. It exists so that the abstractions in other coaching articles have concrete examples to point to, and so that Jason can recall the texture of specific engagements when writing, pitching, or coaching new clients with analogous situations.

Organized by engagement type: Cofounder Conflict • Individual Coaching • Wind-Down / Acquisition • Discovery / Short-Form.

Each entry: who they are, what brought them, engagement arc, specific coaching moves Jason made, and the outcomes tracked so far.

Cofounder Conflict Engagements

Splash One — Jeff Wright (CEO), Heather Hussain (CTO), Nate Hussain (COO)

Company: Defense drone company, counter-drone technology. Founded October 2024. Mission is directly life-or-death — 9 civilian casualties in recent weeks from enemy drones.

Stage / Numbers: $2.75M raised on $15M post-money valuation (September 2025). $150K monthly burn. $1.8M remaining (~12+ months runway). 9-person team.

Composition: Jeff Wright (CEO, full-time since March 2025, former Special Operations). Heather Hussain (CTO/co-founder, still part-time at Boeing, supposed transition full-time December → March → still pending). Nate Hussain (COO, Heather's husband, active duty military until June–August 2026).

Core crisis: Communication breakdown so severe the three can barely have conversations without conflict. Jeff makes unilateral decisions despite agreeing to consensus; violates agreed job descriptions; undermines Heather's authority (the junior engineer equity incident — Jeff quadrupled an offer after Heather negotiated). Heather works Boeing + 50+ hrs/week unpaid on Splash One. The married-couple CTO/COO dynamic leaves Jeff as structural outsider.

Jason's intervention arc: Crisis discovery (March 2026) → extended diagnostic (8 joint sessions + questionnaires adapted from Gottman 285-item relationship inventory) → physiological regulation tools (pulse oximeters during conflict to track nervous system state; Jeff's trained-athlete baseline means flooding shows up at 80–100 bpm) → structured exercises on validation and active listening.

Signature reframe Jason delivered: "Jeff, you made a promise to bring in outside help. Heather, coaching is a condition for you going all-in. Nathan, you said this feels existential. None of you gets what you want if this goes on as is."

Follow-through discipline built into coaching: "Every session starts with a check on last week's commitments. What happened, what didn't, why. This is the AAR you haven't been doing."

Key question still unresolved: Nate's observation — "What does Jeff actually want? Because increasingly it's looking like he just wants her on a slide deck, versus trusting her opinion or judgment on anything."

Patterns this case illustrates: The married/spouse cofounder dynamic (Heather + Nate as a bloc vs. Jeff outside), the half-time founder problem (Heather's Boeing job as trust wedge), vision challenge as existential threat, the need for explicit follow-through culture.

Max Clarke & Tommy Peeples — Postal

Company: Postal. Started together at Palantir (2021), went through YC, multiple pivots (parametric insurance → AI-enabled compliance / corporate mailbox). Currently ~$1M ARR, 2 technical employees.

Core dynamic: 3-year partnership nearly ended December 2025 when Tommy decided to leave due to burnout, lack of technical inspiration, and escalating conflict. Max fought to keep him. Tommy's description: he'd been "carrying a disproportionate positivity burden to counterbalance Max's persistent negativity." Max's read: Tommy's follow-through gaps (sprint doc updates, deadlines) feel like flawed judgment.

The sabbatical: Tommy took a paid month off. During the absence, Max experienced clarity and high velocity working primarily with Skylar and Paul. This produced Max's uncomfortable observation: "less friction working with Skylar, who gives tactical feedback only — not strategic challenges to my vision."

Tommy's read on Max: "Max doesn't want a yes-person per se, but finds substantive challenges to his vision very frictionful — regardless of whether the challenge is right or wrong."

Gottman-adapted assessment results: Green on trust and commitment. Red on turning-toward and productive conflict. "Negative sentiment override" dominating — a specific Gottman diagnosis where despite business success, negative sentiment colors daily experience.

Jason's key moves:

  • Speaker/Listener exercise: "Tommy's Perspective" and "Max's Perspective" — 15 minutes uninterrupted each, then listener summarizes. Jason to Max when his summary missed key elements: "Your description missed key elements. Can you try again with good faith?"
  • Portfolio approach to project prioritization: 25% maintenance, 50% obvious investments, 25% experimental bets. Forces objective comparison.
  • Direct confrontation of the "no options" narrative: "If you don't do these things for yourself, you're still going to lose Tommy as cofounder anyway. I don't accept the idea that there's literally nothing that could be done."

Outcome (April 2026): Tommy returned from sabbatical refreshed. Cargill deal validated direction. Both reporting: "Business is better now than it has been, but founder experience improved too." Negative attribution cycle named and tracked. Max visibly effortful on reducing negativity.

Patterns this case illustrates: The sabbatical/time-away dynamic, vision-challenge-as-threat, negative sentiment override, positive reinforcement as repair mechanism.

Bivu & Esther "Esty" Scheiner — Shiboleth AI

Company: Shiboleth AI, financial compliance automation for banks and fintechs. Founded January 2026 from WeWork "Idea Tuesday" friendship → dating → cofounders. ~$1M ARR, 3-person team.

Composition: Bivu (from Nepal; mother and sister in home country he wants to support; ~$200–300K/year family-support goal is his deep motivation). Esther "Esty" Scheiner (from Hasidic family, 10 siblings, strict upbringing; recently engaged to a non-Jew; breakup with fiancé during coaching engagement; severe ADHD).

Core conflict: Esty operates on "autopilot" under stress. Takes Shabbat and Jewish holidays off (creates ongoing tension). Poor follow-through on commitments. Relationship history makes business disagreements emotionally loaded. Bivu yells when frustrated; Esty goes silent/flat when overwhelmed. Her ADHD + his intensity + religious commitments + family obligations = pressure cooker.

The defining frame Jason named: The pressure cooker dynamic — Bivu's personal duty to bring his mother and sister to the US is tangled with Shiboleth's success. When Esty blocks progress, it doesn't just slow the company; it feels like a block on his duty to his family. Every dropped ball becomes an existential threat.

Jason's key moves:

  • Family-goal separation intervention: "Your family goal needs its own plan, separate from the company's trajectory, so you have agency and can make progress on it regardless of what happens at Shiboleth." Asked Bivu to map three concrete family support pathways outside of Shiboleth outcomes.
  • Neurodivergence reframe for Esty's "autopilot": "Like menstrual cycle variability — sometimes debilitating, sometimes not. Plans may need to change despite good intentions. The issue is neurological, not character."
  • Pulse oximeter session: Analyzed recorded call with physiological data — Bivu 96/85 BPM, Esty 99–102 BPM above emotional flooding threshold. Both surprised how early the flooding kicked in.
  • Personal-history deep dive: Surfaced Bivu's father's death and violent home; Esty's experiences with bullying and family chaos. The business conflict was partly re-enacting older trauma.
  • Religious commitments named as non-negotiable, not obstacles: Shabbat is part of Esty. Designing around it ≠ accommodating weakness.
  • Structured brainstorming around Esty's ADHD: Separate problem-surfacing sessions from solution-finding sessions to match her processing.

Outcome: Bivu mapping concrete family-goal pathways. Esty showing engagement improvements within 10 days (Bivu noticed). Vegas conference success. Both now able to name "autopilot" as stress response without it being an insult.

Patterns this case illustrates: The pressure cooker dynamic, neurodivergent processing mismatch, personal-duty-tied-to-company-performance, separation of religious/family constraints from business conflict.

Daniel Cervoni & Kyle Franz — CommodityAI

Company: CommodityAI. CTRM (Commodity Trading & Risk Management) software, post-insurance pivot. Just signed Cargill for ~$500K — major external validation of the new direction. Phil is CEO/sales; Kyle handles product/vision; Daniel handles engineering + customer success; Zach is another engineer.

Core dynamic: Kyle applied inconsistent rigor standards — demanded RFCs from Daniel but not from Kyle or Zach. Daniel felt excluded from product decisions. December conflict over engineering philosophy / code ownership created deep trust breach. Daniel's read: "I don't think [Kyle is] very emotionally aware. He doesn't want to find middle ground. He wants to establish his own vision and philosophy, and he doesn't want to compromise."

Kyle's avoidance strategy: A month of minimal communication with Daniel to avoid friction. It worked operationally. But as Jason named it: "You dug a hole. Now we climb out by staying in communication."

Both neurodivergent: Daniel ADHD-diagnosed. Kyle borderline. Different processing, different working styles.

Jason's key moves:

  • Four-dimension questionnaire assessment: Vision alignment (green), trust (yellow), conflict (red), teamwork (red).
  • Joint narrative-writing exercise on December conflict: both wrote their accounts separately, then compared. Surfaced how the same event produced two non-overlapping stories.
  • Integrity moments framing: Jason's specific term — "Times when someone felt the other person's words and actions didn't line up. Our goal is: can we understand those moments enough that, going forward, we can flag and repair them earlier?"
  • Bathroom mirror analogy for intent vs. impact: "Emotional hurt is like accidental physical contact. Even without bad intentions, impact still matters and requires awareness and prevention."
  • Pendulum theory: "Kyle may be overcorrecting from historically being too accommodating. Now swinging to being inflexible." Names the dynamic without judgment.
  • Forgiveness ≠ reconciliation: "Forgiveness does not require the other person to do anything. But that doesn't mean you want to spend time with this person or work with them."

Outcome: Cargill's $500K deal validated Kyle's product direction externally (Daniel could accept it when the market did). Moved from month-long avoidance to daily small touch-points. Both agreeing "both on same side of table" vs. "1 vs. 1." Named concrete rigor standards question for next session.

Patterns this case illustrates: Different standards as dishonesty trigger, avoidance as short-term fix with long-term cost, neurodivergent processing mismatch, external validation as trust-repair accelerator.

Meng Fei Shen & Christina — Rumacare

Company: Rumacare. Prior authorization and copay enrollment for infusion clinics (healthcare operations). YC Winter 2026 batch. Completed demo day 2–3 weeks before engagement began. Fundraising nearly complete (over halfway done, waiting on lead investor due diligence).

Core dynamic (early-stage assessment): During fundraising, operations responsibilities slipped; Christina became confrontational. Christina's framing: "Work slides down to me because I'm the engineer." Meng Fei's experience: handling relationships, sales, strategy, fundraising, and feeling blamed. Communication breakdown: Meng Fei creates investor updates with no acknowledgment from Christina. Christina wants to be asked to help; Meng Fei only shares successes, not struggles. Different support needs — Meng Fei needs emotional validation; Christina defaults to problem-solving. Recognition imbalance — Christina does engineering + operations, Meng Fei gets external recognition from investors.

Engagement stage: Very early. Joint discovery call April 10, 2026. Validation technique demonstrated live. Proposed 3-month coaching structure.

Patterns this case illustrates: Fundraising stress as cofounder conflict trigger, recognition imbalance, different support needs, the CEO-gets-the-glory-CTO-does-the-work dynamic.

Shruti Tibrewala & Dave — DoubleBlindBio

Company: DoubleBlindBio (biotech). Shruti Tibrewala came to Jason for a discovery call about her deteriorating partnership with Dave (CTO).

Shruti's situation: Trust breakdown with Dave around leadership fitness, engineering team problems, and 6 months of lost progress. She issued an ultimatum 2 weeks before the discovery call; Dave responded with some improvement (more open, less defensive, willing to fire underperformers). Original partnership strong — "activation energy" around diversity/equity in biotech — but the company scaled faster than the relationship's maturity. Dave became father to a 7-month-old around the same time the company scaled.

Jason's framing during discovery:

  • Trust operates on three dimensions: confidence trust (capability), honesty trust (truthfulness), benevolence trust (good intentions). Each is separately repairable (or separately broken).
  • Rebuilding trust requires consistent touch-points where you experience small reaffirmations.
  • Every relationship dynamic involves two people — rarely one-sided. This is Jason's structural move to avoid the coaching trap of siding with one party before the work begins.
  • Partner-based relationships make one-sided PIP-style fixes hard — structured improvement plans assume one person can be the "performance review" target, but partnerships don't decompose that way.

Outcome: Still in discovery. Formal expectations document for CTO role considered as intermediate step.

Patterns this case illustrates: The "is it reparable?" diagnostic, trust framework as assessment tool, scaling-faster-than-relationship dynamic, Dave's new-fatherhood-during-scale as compounding variable.

Rahul — Married-Couple Cofounders (company name redacted in notes)

Situation: Rahul cofounded in February 2022 with a married couple — husband is CTO, wife is CEO. He'd known the husband 12+ years; less close with the wife. Company is doing well financially (potential $5M deal pending, the largest they've ever had), but the relationship dynamics haven't changed.

The exit signal: In December 2024, Rahul told his cofounders he's transitioning out, framing as "burnout" (2 kids: 2yo + 7mo, averaged 3 hours sleep/night for 2 months). The real issue: poor conflict resolution, feeling like the third wheel between the married couple, work dumping pattern. CEO's line to him: "You complain about contracts, so now sales is your job." He's handling 50%+ of sales work.

The backhanded-compliment pattern: "You're finally acting like a founder after 4 years" — said to him while the company was doing better than ever because of his customer-facing work.

Post-paternity-leave boundary-setting: Rahul held his limits. Cofounders called him "arrogant." Cold war dynamics followed.

Jason's intervention approach: Proposed 3-month facilitated process (~$10–15K) using a sabbatical framing as face-saving narrative. Decouples the exit story from "I couldn't handle it" to "I took time to consider my next chapter." Post-exit, Rahul is eyeing Head of Field Engineering roles or AI agents startups — which undermines the burnout framing and suggests the exit is about the relationship, not the work capacity.

Patterns this case illustrates: The married-cofounder third-wheel dynamic, competence-becomes-burden, the difference between burnout-as-framing and burnout-as-actual-cause, the face-saving exit narrative.

Individual Coaching Engagements

Nick Confrey — Tome (wound down, then Meta L7)

Company: Tome, a social reading platform. Raised seed; built team of ~3 (James, Olivia, Roque); hit top App Store position; accumulated hundreds of paying customers.

Engagement arc: Multi-month, January → April 2026. Started with tactical M&A coaching; shifted to long-term visioning (5-year plan, family with wife Emily moving to Boston for a Suno job); pivoted to managing team wind-down and relaunch around a communities feature; ended with personal resilience coaching through the November 2025 team reductions.

The acquisitions / negotiation track: Nick received a Level 7 product offer from Meta (reporting to Ime, who reports to Tom Allison). He asked for $1M signing bonus. Parallel conversations with Barnes & Noble and Reading Rhythms for acquisition of Tome. Also dropped Anthropic from his interview process.

Jason's key negotiation moves (rich material for negotiation-coaching):

  • "Play out weaker hands for leverage. Sometimes you need to play out worse hands just so you have something to negotiate against, because right now you don't have anything else."
  • Suggested exploring OpenAI as a fast-track competing offer, purely for negotiation cover, even if not bullish long-term.
  • Fiduciary-duty framing: "You are actually legally obligated to present an auction… you cannot demonstrate fiduciary duty by just handing it off to someone."
  • Strategic pullback with Reading Rhythms after they made presumptuous asks (wanting Tome's treasury): send a message that resets the dynamic.
  • Board memo as pre-negotiation setup: draft a document laying out all paths considered (continue, pivot, seed extension, wind-down + asset sale) to demonstrate to investors you exhausted every option before the chosen path.
  • Personal follow-up notes to investors beyond monthly updates — human-touch messages inviting conversation.
  • "All of this is made up, and you can kinda just ask for what you want."

Key outcomes:

  • Landed Meta L7 offer with strong reporting chain
  • Pivoted Tome from user feed to topic-based communities (launched November 2025)
  • Fired entire team (Roque, James, Olivia); extended runway from 6 months to 18+ months
  • Started consistent LinkedIn publishing (100s of posts, strong engagement)
  • Clarified personal values (empowering creativity, human connection) and integrated into product + personal narrative

Patterns this case illustrates: Wind-down navigation, parallel negotiation management, wartime CEO posture, the "you're not quitting your mission if you change this specific version" reframe.

Nimit Maru — Sava

Company: Sava, regulated trust/wills platform. Nimit is a second-time founder (prior: Full Stack, $5M annual revenue, successful exit to Everplans). Started Sava in 2025 after a previous founder breakup produced clinical depression and a 30-lb weight gain.

Engagement arc: Monthly 2–4 session rhythm, January–April 2026. Moved through: existential crisis / financial trauma (Feb, hotel deal fraud) → health/exercise compliance (Feb–Mar) → hiring/capital deployment (Mar–Apr) → compartmentalization under ongoing litigation stress (Apr).

The concurrent crises:

  • Hotel property fraud/bankruptcy: $3M personal guarantee at risk. Auction winner turned out to be a con artist who signed a purchase agreement but never paid the deposit.
  • Cofounder fallout from the previous company still causing trust issues.
  • Burnout from 9-9-6 schedule.
  • Physical health decline — 30 lbs above prior baseline.

Jason's signature move on the hotel crisis — Obama compartmentalization: "During the bin Laden raid, Obama separated personal stress from tactical decision-making. You can hold the hotel litigation in one compartment and build Sava in another. They do not have to bleed into each other."

On exercise as stress solution (not weight loss strategy):

  • "Endorphins are endogenous morphine — your body's natural painkiller released during exertion."
  • YouTube workouts as accessible entry: 15–35 minute videos eliminate friction (no membership, no commute, just do it).
  • Separate exercise from weight goal — exercise = daily stress relief; weight loss = lagging indicator.

On financial catastrophizing: "Even $1-2M loss will not destroy you — you still have company, family, standard of living." Portfolio-level reframe.

Mindset shift: "New Game Plus — you beat the final boss (first exit, prior company). Now you have all the upgrades. The next level is gravy. No pressure, all upside."

Key outcomes:

  • Recovered 7+ lbs in 3 weeks via food tracking
  • Hired two key team members (trust company expert at 1% + 2.5% equity; engineering contractor)
  • Moved office from WeWork to owned space (22-year lease)
  • Reframed hotel crisis as "CEO cross-training" for future high-stakes negotiations
  • Pursued $500K settlement offer to exit hotel liability entirely

Patterns this case illustrates: Crisis compartmentalization, exercise-as-stress-mechanism (not weight), New Game Plus mindset, second-time-founder dynamics.

Yoshio Goto — UltraSpeak (Jason's longest-running engagement)

Company: UltraSpeak. AI-powered communication/speech product. Yoshio is a Japanese founder. Cofounder Tristan has decision-making style that Yoshio finds frustrating; another cofounder pushes marketing language Yoshio considers misguided for cohort fulfillment. Also running a side project called Wagon.

Engagement arc: Weekly cadence, longest-running of Jason's active clients (127KB of notes across multiple months). Started tactical (AI roadmap, team management); shifted to founder psychology, compartmentalization, long-term vision clarity.

Jason's move on the marketing-language disagreement between cofounders: "You could run one sort of stream that is that. This is where an agent could be useful — each gets a marketing agent, its own walled version to test." A/B test rather than argue.

Recurring themes in the engagement: AI implementation strategy, cofounder friction with Tristan over product direction, data-driven vs. intuition-driven decision disagreements, monetization opportunities Yoshio was underweighting.

Status: Active and ongoing. Deep multi-session relationship; rich reference material for future analysis.

Harsha Vankayalapati — AgentWeb

Company: AgentWeb. AI-powered marketing agency (agents for ads, content, email, landing pages). Founded November 2025. Raised $500K seed at $10M valuation in late 2025. Team of 4–5: Harsha, Ray (CTO), Fang Fang (CPO), Matt (CMO).

Financials: $12K MRR at start (November). $15K MRR by February 2026. $60K/month burn. 8–9 months runway.

Engagement arc: 20+ sessions (November 2025 – April 2026). Monthly check-ins plus ad-hoc. Covered pricing strategy, team accountability, GTM pivots, founder burnout, acquisition planning.

Jason's signature pricing moves (rich material for any pricing coaching):

  • "Money-first approach is always best: Don't believe anything till the money gets made. If they send over the money, then worst case you renegotiate."
  • "$500 pricing is a problematic no-man's-land — expensive for software, not expensive for service. It's hard to believe that service will be good at $500."
  • On upfront fees: "You're giving them a robot. If the robot's broken, that's on you. If the robot's doing what they told it to do and it doesn't work for them, that's their problem."
  • On the "monkey hand in the coconut": holding too many service offerings prevents focusing on what works; cut options to reduce decision fatigue and team confusion.
  • Stack-rank clients quarterly: "You dump your 25% least profitable clients and create room to grow."
  • When customers ask for lower price: "It's usually a risk thing — if they knew 100% it would work, they'd pay more."

Key outcomes:

  • Pivoted business model from DIY tool to premium service ($2,500 setup + $200/month subscription, later $8K/month target)
  • Identified "wartime CEO" posture: daily check-ins, task decomposition, accountability framework
  • Narrowed ICP from startups to legacy businesses (healthcare, real estate) after recognizing startup market was already building solutions internally
  • Implemented paid-ads automation as core focus area (vs. content/lead-gen chaos)
  • Clarified that team churn came from revenue confusion (non-cash deals), not product issues

Patterns this case illustrates: Service-to-software positioning, pricing psychology, wartime CEO posture, stack-ranking customers.

Ravi Bakhai — Hype

Company: Hype. Crypto trading app for meme coins, expanded to perpetuals/social/learning. Athlete mentality (played baseball seriously, peak-crash cycles).

Financials: Revenue $20–30K monthly (August 2025). $800–900K runway. Considering three fundraise sizes — Small ($500K–1M @ $25–30M), Medium ($3–5M @ $40–50M), Big ($10–15M @ $80–100M). Competitor raised at $100M.

Engagement arc: Started July 22, 2025. Monthly cadence after restructuring from ad-hoc in December 2025. $6K/year budget.

Jason's signature moves:

  • Gaming/streaming parallel: "How do you make the part around the trade more fun, more interesting, more sticky?" Discord + Twitch + Steam ecosystem model.
  • Baseball peak-crash diagnosis: "Knowing your own patterns is really important." When Ravi went into a slump post-college-launch underperformance (December 2025), Jason used his own baseball language to get him back to intensity.
  • Negotiation coaching with ChatGPT + Chris Voss: mirroring, "help me understand how you got to this number." Ravi saved 40% on the Coinbase debit card deal ($2.5K → $1.5K/month).
  • Messaging clarity: "You might want to have like three different messages for three different audiences."
  • Task importance filter: "Either it's important and therefore somebody who's working should do it. Or it's not that important because you don't want to assign it to somebody else and you don't want to do it yourself."

Outcomes:

  • UGC creator strategy: $1 CAC, 300+ users from single creator, 200+ signups in one week (February 2026)
  • DAUs recovered from 50 (December low) to 300+ by February
  • Cost negotiations saved material runway
  • Three rolling releases planned by April 10, 2026
  • Pratt (Prath) 1:1s on expectations (communication, urgency, scoping) initiated

Patterns this case illustrates: Peak-crash psychological cycles in athlete-founders, negotiation as teachable skill, product positioning clarity through audience segmentation.

Abhishek Ray — Opslane

Background: Former staff engineer at Robinhood. Now solo founder/content creator.

Engagement arc: Coaching began January 22, 2026. Core issue: multi-workstream overwhelm (verification tool + coding course + content/social media).

The three workstreams:

  • Verification tool — Stuck 3 weeks on autonomous stub data generation
  • Claude Code Camp — Sold out at 30 people @ $99 each (December 5, 2025); Cohort 2 at $149
  • Content — LinkedIn, Reddit, YouTube presence; newsletter 100+ subscribers in <1 month

Financial milestones:

  • First revenue: $400 from 4 customers (November 5, 2025)
  • Revenue targets: Oct $100 ✓, Nov $1K, Dec $2K (achieved $3K), March $10K MRR
  • Raised $500 on Reddit ads (2.5% CTR, 183 clicks, 4 conversions = $30 CAC)
  • 300 GitHub stars on proxy tool after a 2-hour build
  • Hired VA (Dan) at $900/month for B2B outreach

Jason's signature moves:

  • Lead with the Robinhood credential: "That's the special thing. This is not just another vibe coder." Put the "former staff engineer at Robinhood" line at the top of the landing page.
  • Demo day deadline: Set April 6th as hard deadline — 4-week sprint. "Maybe people will tell you this is useless without the stub data part and then now you're really motivated."
  • Send dedicated sales newsletter, not a footnote: "It's actually good to send it at the same time."
  • Content as emotional arc, not technical detail: "What's interesting is the emotional arc. This was really pissing me off, I tried this, that, this didn't work, and then I realized..."

Outcome: Broke through scope paralysis by shipping stripped-down V1 without autonomous stub feature. Clear 3-product roadmap. First revenue validated. VA hired, booking 4-5 calls/week.

Patterns this case illustrates: Multi-workstream founder overwhelm, scope paralysis breakthrough via deadline, content-as-emotional-arc (not tutorial).

Thomas Scaria — Lore / Kraken acqui-hire

Company: Lore (fintech/crypto; tokenizing ETFs on-chain). Harvard grad, from Chicago (Booth professor family). Raised $18M Series A from Accel before the pivot.

The crisis sequence:

  • Pivoted from retail crypto trading to B2B2C (white-label ETF platform for exchanges)
  • 4-story fall in January 2026 — fractured pelvis, 10-hour surgery
  • Company became insolvent during hospitalization (January 22, 2026)
  • Team volunteered after furlough; maintained loyalty despite no payroll
  • Wife Kat demanded he exit business; separated after 18 months of promised outcomes without results
  • Secured verbal commits from Sui Foundation ($125K strategic investment + line of credit)
  • Kraken LOI signed (December 2025), press release December 3, 2025
  • Soft offer received March 13, 2026 for co-GM role at xDocs (Kraken's "Stripe for stocks" unit, in partnership with Nasdaq)

Jason's signature moves:

  • Ring-bearer metaphor: "You've been trying to do something extremely difficult that required you to be a certain kind of way… you've gotten warped by the weight." Suggested an external advisor/"godfather" for emotional support separate from business coaching.
  • January 31 hard deadline: removed limbo. Forced decision between bridge, acqui-hire, shutdown.
  • Team-loyalty test reframe: "Everyone went 'oh Captain, my Captain' and they have been volunteering their time." Means something — treat them as your greatest asset in negotiation.
  • Survival reframe: "Never get wiped out. As long as you're alive, as long as the fund is still solvent, you can still do things."

Outcomes:

  • Signed Kraken LOI (validates pivot)
  • Maintained team loyalty through insolvency
  • Secured soft Kraken co-GM offer
  • Pursuing acqui-hire sequence (mock interviews, team positioning)
  • Began dating, reconnecting with self-care (walking with crutches, therapy)

Patterns this case illustrates: Founder identity warping under existential stress, the acqui-hire sequence, post-crash life reconstruction.

Lily Zhao — Evolve (YC W'26)

Background: 30-year-old from Chicago (professors for parents). Cornell equestrian. 10-year career hopping (PE → restaurants → Instacart → acting/screenwriting → a16z → content roles). Cofounded Evolve, a YC Winter 2026 startup.

Financials: Raised $1.5M total ($500K angels @ $8M post, $500K YC, $500K additional). Runway until August 2026 before retirement funds must cash out. Monthly retainer with Jason: $2.5K (20% discount for 3-month YC period).

Cofounder dynamic: Sam (Harvard grad, Brex 3 years, likely autistic). Demanding ultimatums on YC deal. Gaslighting, control, broken promises pattern. Lily provided consumer instincts; Sam coded.

Compounding stressors: Post-concussion syndrome limiting social ability. Recent breakup with serious boyfriend. Family pressuring her on cofounder conflict. Pattern of becoming complacent in relationships, people-pleasing, perfectionism blocking content creation.

Jason's signature moves:

  • Pattern diagnosis: "You become complacent when you're with men. And you agreed to be with this man. So you agreed up front to enter a space where you can become complacent." Links to childhood (Chinese upbringing, conflict avoidance).
  • Self-trust as competitive advantage: "One of the most important things you have to do is build a deeper degree of self-trust. You have to trust your own instincts." Especially for outliers who don't fit standard templates.
  • Reframe of "visionary" vs. "operator": Lily believed she was an operator because she executed. Jason countered: "Your skills might be the same as Steve Jobs — curation, translation, alchemy. You weren't failing to execute; you were being asked to execute someone else's vision."
  • On gaslighting cofounders: "It's a very dangerous game to play. When you're entering a situation where you know you're gonna have to gaslight." Document conversations. Stand firm on principles.
  • Concrete partnership examples — gave her specific examples of what supportive partnership looks like (childcare, career help, sacrifice) so she can recognize it vs. traditional models she witnessed.

Key outcomes:

  • Rejected operations role Sam wanted her in → better creative design opportunity emerged ($25K for a Series A pitch deck)
  • Received creative director offer after just 2 Medium articles
  • Won $500 in poker game #2
  • Pricing confidence increased significantly
  • Shifted identity from "operator" to "visionary"

Patterns this case illustrates: Female founder identity work, gaslighting cofounder dynamics, consumer-taste-as-competence (vs. operator framing), people-pleasing as career constraint.

Wind-Down / Acquisition Engagements

Brooke Hartley Moy — Infactory

Background: Female founder, 30s. Lawyer background, then Humane (the failed AI pin). Founded Infactory (AI data enrichment for video/multimodal). Raised $4M seed at $25M valuation. ~7-person team (6 technical, 1 ops).

The existential situation: Post-Humane failure → imposter syndrome. Multiple cofounder departures (Ken Kocienda — Safari creator — left; Felipe left early). Fundraising trough. Personal struggle: "am I good enough?" Seeking to wind down gracefully or be acquired.

Engagement arc: 8+ sessions, February–April 2026. Fundraising pitch refinement → existential reframing → acquisition strategy.

Jason's signature moves:

  • The Titanic chef reframe: "You were the chef on the Titanic. You served great food. The ship sank because of market conditions, not because of you."
  • "You've pre-suffered": "You've already cycled through early stages of grief, which means you're more emotionally prepared than you realize."
  • "Business artist" reframe: "Three out of four of the original reasons to start the company — autonomy, creativity, modeling risk-taking for your son — are still achieved, even if the financial outcome isn't. The act of building is the real payout. Financial outcome is bonus."
  • Three tiers of success post-wind-down: (1) retain reputational credibility, (2) take care of the team, (3) return capital to investors.
  • Scale-sized hole in the market: Position Infactory as what Scale would be if started today — a wedge for acquirers.
  • Schlep problem positioning: Frontier AI labs prefer to buy enriched data rather than do cleanup work themselves.
  • Alter Ego + physical totem for pitches: Standing desk, specific persona ("channel my high school friend Becky"), physical ritual to reduce nervous energy.

Key outcomes:

  • Pitch confidence "10x more confident" post-coaching
  • Recent pitches going over time (positive signal — investors engaged)
  • Secured OpenAI meeting after long pursuit
  • Team retention: 6 out of 7 stayed post-departures
  • Dream job opportunity emerged (mid-market PE operator, higher comp than ever made)
  • Internal CTO promotion path established

Patterns this case illustrates: Wind-down dignity, "you've pre-suffered" reframe, business-artist identity, Alter Ego performance tools.

Conner — Onditto (short engagement)

Company: Onditto. Pivoted to photo-curation platform from original "Ditto" product. Young team (5–6 engineers).

Situation: Team trust rebuilding post-pivot announcement. Engineers expressed concerns about mission shift. Need to reestablish confidence + implement new operational rhythms.

Jason's moves:

  • "Booster rocket phase" for early cofounders: Provided necessary thrust, natural evolution to next phase — not abandonment of mission.
  • Separate goal-setting from performance reviews: Reduces anxiety, creates growth-oriented conversation.
  • Time-boxed intensity: "4–6 weeks with clear endpoint" feels less like grind, more like sprint.
  • Weekly engineering priority syncs + user-research shareouts: Team satisfaction improved. "I feel really good about this. Like I just like knowing what's going on."

Status: Single April session; early stage. Clear wins already.

Jennifer Wei — Stripe PIP (short engagement)

Background: Mid-level PM at Stripe. Placed on PIP despite strong results. Partner also building diversity training business. Living in NYC. Aiming to pivot to women's fashion D2C brand.

Engagement: Single discovery session in March 2026.

Jason's signature moves:

  • Reframe performance issue as company politics: "Your manager doesn't want you there and is using vagueness to prevent ability to pass bar." Standards vary widely depending on leadership.
  • Mental health leave as strategic move: "Get on the mental health leave — it's the move, and I know many people who have done it." Protects equity vesting timeline.
  • Consulting as bridge: "Really nice bridge into entrepreneurship because you make money, have clients, are being creative." Builds systems, marketing, business-operations skills in low-risk environment.
  • "Corporate legibility" insight: "Research shows immigrants become entrepreneurs because [they are] less legible in the labor market." Jennifer was hitting strong business results but not "legible" in executive presence terms — fine for founder path.

Status: Proposed 4-month engagement ($5K, every-other-week) pending leave approval.

Tony Stubblebine — Interview Prep (unusual engagement type)

Context: Not a coaching client. Tony is CEO of Medium. Jason is interviewing him for the nascent "Wide Ambition" book project. This is inverted — Jason is coaching himself on how to extract insights from Tony, not coaching Tony operationally. See book-projects-arc for the Wide Ambition thesis.

Jason's interview strategy:

  • Don't lead with the public career summary. Tony has told the MasterCard → O'Reilly → Odeo → CrowdVine → Lift → Medium story a dozen times. He'll be on autopilot.
  • Start with the emotional/financial material — the two new details Tony texted: "poor overachiever with real financial fears in his 30s" and "more fit in 40s than 30s." This is unmined territory.
  • Pull the ego thread. "Hard on ego" is a specific emotional claim. Overachievers don't usually admit this publicly.
  • Counterfactual framing: "Is there a version of your life where you optimized harder on one of those and got rich faster? And if so, what would you have lost?"

Why this engagement matters for the wiki: It's the first live example of the Wide Ambition thesis and shows Jason's writing/research method. He's coaching himself-as-interviewer using the same moves he'd use on a coaching client.

Cross-Case Patterns (Synthesized)

See the dedicated articles for deeper treatment of each pattern:

Thread · 0 replies+ add reply
no replies yet — be the first to write back to this article.