raw / ---Cofounder Videos/Old-wounds-old-ways.txt
Raw source · read-only
Old-wounds-old-ways.txt
---Cofounder Videos/Old-wounds-old-ways.txt
What’s really happening when your cofounder seems unreasonable or incompetent (and how to fix it) ================================================== You keep having the same fight with your cofounder around missed deadlines or product quality or who’s doing enough. You try talking about it but it always devolves into frustration and feeling like they just don’t get it. Now you’re thinking this person might fundamentally be wrong for you. You're actually just stuck in a dynamic that’s super common, but hard to see from the inside. I’ve worked with 6 cofounders teams on conflict so far, mostly YC founders, and I’m starting to see a pattern that I’m calling Old Wounds and Old Ways. Why you have the same fights You have some version of the same disagreement and every time you land in one of two places. My cofounder is way too sensitive. I can't say / do anything without them overreacting. Or: Why can't this person get this one thing right? I do my part — why is it so hard for them to do theirs? Both feel completely reasonable positions. But of course, you’re caught up in the moment. Neither you nor your cofounder are unreasonable or incompetent. If you were, you never would have gotten to this point: recruited into elite firms, shipped product, led teams, gotten into YC or landed any traction with your company. So if neither of you is broken, what's going on? It’s about a particular interaction between the two of you. This is well-known in the realm of couples counseling: Gottman's lab found that 69% of recurring conflicts in partnerships are perpetual. Not because people can't communicate, but because the conflicts are rooted in fundamental differences in personality, values, and history. Psychologist Dan Wile put it this way: when you choose a long-term partner, you're choosing a particular set of unsolvable problems to deal with for the next 20, 30 years That sounds grim until you see the flip side. Gallup found that 83% of people in strong working partnerships said "we accept each other as we are and don't try to change each other." In unsuccessful partnerships it was 16%. The question isn't "how do I fix my cofounder?" It's: what are we not seeing about why we keep colliding in this specific way? Old Wounds and Old Ways The pattern has two parts. An Old Wound is an emotional trigger — a sensitivity that bothers you more than it probably should. When someone hits it, your reaction is disproportionate to what actually happened. You can feel it even when you can't stop it. An Old Way is an ingrained habit your cofounder has carried for years. Maybe it was valued in previous jobs, or it was always a weakness but other strengths compensated. Either way, it's baked in. One founder’s Old Way is hitting the other founder’s Old Wound, and neither can see the full picture. I’ve worked with a CTO who was organized and conscientious, paired with a CEO who was creative and relaxed about structure. When the CEO missed a deadline, the CTO didn't just get frustrated. He got furious. What he said: “Why can't you just do what you say you're going to do?” What he didn't say: It kills me when people don't follow through. It always has. Long before this company existed. That's his Old Wound — reliability. The CEO's response: “Why do you have to be so intense and aggro all the time?” What she didn't say: I know I should be better at this. I'm trying. But it's never enough, and I'm a little ashamed of it. That's her Old Way — loose execution. Because neither can see the other's inner experience, the fight stays on the surface. Always about the deadline, never about what's underneath. As a personal example: My wife was bullied in middle school by girls who'd make fun of her and laugh in that passive-aggressive way. It left her sensitive to being laughed at when there's no obvious joke. I sometimes look at her and just laugh out of happiness or because of something endearing she did. She gets annoyed. Wants to know what I'm laughing at. But laughing is spontaneous. I can't always explain it fast enough, and by then her Old Wound is already activated. Her Old Wound: being laughed at. My Old Way: laughing without thinking. The dynamic could be anything: speed, rigor, risk tolerance, consideration for others — any place where two people have different histories, this pattern shows up. How do you know you’re in this situation? Ask yourself this: The Old Wound: Is there something that, when you step back honestly, you know isn't as big a deal as you make it? But in the moment, it activates you so strongly you can't stop yourself? The Old Way: Is there something you know you should change, but every time you try, it doesn't stick? And you’re a little embarrassed about it? Here's what makes it so hard to see: the Old Wound makes the Old Way feel intentional — like they're doing it to you on purpose. And their shame about the Old Way makes your reaction feel like an attack. Neither is true. But it feels true to both of you. That's why the fight never resolves. How to fix it: The way you get out of this is through self-reflection, transparent communication, non-judgmental listening, and empathetic inquiry. The mindset to have: This is neither your cofounder's fault nor yours. These patterns developed over years, long before you met each other. But it's both of your responsibility to deal with them together. The problem isn't your cofounder. It's the interaction between your Old Wound and their Old Way — sitting in the middle of the table, with both of you on the same side looking at it. The moment one of you thinks "this is something wrong with you that needs fixing," you're fighting each other, not the real problem. Conversation 1: The origin story. Each of you spends time alone first. What's your Old Wound? Can you trace a story from before this partnership where that sensitivity got triggered? A previous boss, a college roommate who let you down. Something that left a mark. Then sit down together. Each person tells a story from before this company about where the wound comes from — not about the cofounder. The other person's only job: listen and play back what they heard. No challenging. No problem-solving. This sounds too simple. But it changes things — because for the first time, each person sees why the other reacts the way they do. A 30-year study out of the University of Minnesota found that early relational experiences shape how we handle conflict decades later. This runs deep. You can't logic your way past it. Conversation 2: The small adjustments. Come back a few days later. For the person with the Old Wound: "What part about this interaction hurts the most? Is there a way to adjust how this lands?” Maybe its a giving an early heads-up when a deadline will slip instead of silence until the last minute. Maybe it’s communicating the effort you’ve put into trying to hit the mark. You're designing a small buffer between the behavior and the trigger. For the person with the Old Way: "What's the hardest part about shifting this? How can I help you with this?" Sometimes it's a cue problem — they forget in the moment and need a system. Solvable. Sometimes it's identity — they've always been "the creative one" and adjusting threatens who they understand themselves to be. Harder. Sometimes it's shame — they feel broken for having the Old Way, and every time you raise it, they hear "you're deficient" even when that's not what you're saying. Different situations, different adjustments. Then really try to notice small improvements — because what gets reinforced gets repeated. A 20% improvement on something they've struggled with their entire adult life is worth recognizing. One warning: resist the urge to make this a project. You're not trying to overhaul your cofounder or yourself. You're looking for small adjustments that reduce how often the Old Way hits the Old Wound, and how much it stings when it does. This what acceptance actually looks like in a partnership (back to the Gallup thing). It’s not about lowering your standards, but understanding that your cofounder is a whole person with a history that shaped them. Just like you have one that shaped you — and choosing to work with that reality instead of against it. So try having the two conversations. You'll still get frustrated. But at least you'll know what's actually happening beneath the surface — and so will your cofounder. And it can and will get better, even if it never goes away entirely. Your product is always evolving, growing, and occasionally crapping out. So is your partnership. Hope this helps.
promote · cite · dialogue ⟶ coming in M3